Tim Tyler, Richard Dawkins and Susan Blackmore have contributed to the erroneous perception that memetics is for non-believers alone. No legitimate scientific discipline sets such a requirement.
In these pages you will find ideas which jive with your rational explanations of the universe. But unlike the 1st version of memetic theory, you will also be challenged to question your assumptions, your acts of faith in current paradigms, your confirmation bias. If you have hostility towards believers, you will not find assistance here.
Genetic science is broad enough to appeal to believers and non-believers alike. There is no cause to suspect the science of the second replicator would be less broad in its appeal. Just as in genetic science, the more people participating in memetic science, the stronger the discipline will become.
Some sub-disciplines may appeal more to believers or alternatively non-believers. Good. Let's work together.
Just as the biosphere is threatened by rapid environmental change brought about by human action, the memosphere is threatened. We are loosing survival knowledge, traditional technologies, languages and social networks. By thinking and behaving alike, we limit the variations which might empower our species to survive the environmental and social challenges of the 21st Century.
It's easy to become protectionist of a discipline which promises a cause-&-effect explanation of the cacophony of human culture. It's easy to be defensive about one's personal understanding of the universe. But defensiveness just starts an emotional cold-war. We don't have time for the easy path.
Let's not sacrifice the few or the many to get to a better future. Encourage believers to look deeply into memetics. Don't turn them away or turn them off.
Most atheists are too protective to evaluate the scientific process in light of memetic theory, and perhaps believers will have valuable insights there.
Believers could also provide critiques of political and "rational" (non-metaphysical) ideologies and their manipulation of human will and social design. They could intuitively resolve the toxic code-rot of their faith traditions while preserving the best innovations (something which outsiders can never do).
Finally, I appeal to you not to throw out the alliance of counselors, Religious Studies scholars and others who value diversity, personal relationships and mutual education, refraining from the deity debate.
We all have something to contribute to the conversation.
Memetics will be stronger if we work together.
Deny no one a seat at the table.